Below is much documentation to evaluate the piece of content we’re working on. Please take this all into consideration and use the key points while we are working on this article.
Most importantly, the article should showcase E-E-A-T:
- Google values websites that demonstrate experience, expertise, authority, and trustworthiness (E-E-A-T).
- A combination of the creator, the content, and the website determines E-E-A-T.
- E-E-A-T is especially important for websites that publish YMYL (your money, your life) content.
Here is the link to Google’s official rating documentation:
Please Read it first.
Enhancing for Helpfulness and Expertise
These points ensure that the content is helpful and valuable to the audience. For each point, evaluate the content and provide improvements.
- Enhancing the content by adding unique perspectives, research findings, or original analysis that showcase expertise and demonstrate a high level of effort and skill.
- Improving the content by conducting further research, adding unique insights, enhancing clarity and readability, addressing any errors or stylistic issues, and ensuring a high standard of production.
- Strengthening the content’s expertise by providing clear sourcing, citing reputable references, showcasing author expertise, and ensuring factual accuracy.
- Refining the content to address the needs and interests of the target audience, provide practical insights, maintain a clear focus, offer actionable information, and enhance the overall user experience.
Evaluate for Topical Coverage
Here are the criteria for evaluating the topical coverage of an article. For each criterion, evaluate the content and provide improvements.
- Evaluate the article for semantic topic modeling techniques such as word co-occurrence clustering and weighted bigraph clustering to ensure the discovery of semantically meaningful topics in search queries. Identify areas where these techniques can be incorporated or improved within the article.
- Analyze the alignment of the article’s content with the identified topics of interest to the target audience or analyst. Identify any gaps or areas where the content could be expanded to better address the audience’s needs and interests. Provide specific suggestions or examples of information that can be added or modified in the article to improve the alignment.
- Assess the article’s coverage of chosen topics and recommend additions or expansions to provide comprehensive coverage. Identify any subtopics or aspects related to the main subject that are missing or not adequately addressed. Propose new sections or paragraphs to ensure a more thorough and comprehensive exploration of the chosen topics.
- Incorporate topic ontologies and semantic similarity data to evaluate the relevance and effectiveness of the covered topics. Identify sections where these evaluation techniques can be utilized to assess the article’s content. Provide specific examples or instructions on how to incorporate topic ontologies and semantic similarity data to enhance the article.
- Review the article for citations of relevant research papers or scholarly articles to support the covered topics. Identify areas where additional citations can be included to strengthen the article’s credibility and demonstrate a deeper understanding of the chosen topics. Provide specific recommendations for research papers or scholarly articles that can be cited to support the covered topics.
- Evaluate the article’s search engine optimization (SEO) practices, including keyword usage, meta tags, and backlinks. Provide recommendations on how to optimize the article for improved search engine visibility. Suggest specific keywords, meta tags, or strategies to enhance the article’s SEO performance.
- Assess the article’s unique insights or information that differentiate it from existing content on the same topics. Identify areas where the article can provide additional valuable and unique insights or information. Propose new sections or examples that present fresh perspectives or offer novel information to make the article stand out.
- Review the article’s structure, including headings, subheadings, and content organization. Provide suggestions for improving the clarity and readability of the article. Propose changes to headings, subheadings, or the organization of content to facilitate easier navigation and enhance the overall user experience.
- Verify the accuracy and up-to-dateness of the article’s information. Identify outdated or incorrect information that needs to be updated. Provide the latest research findings or developments in the covered topics and suggest where they can be incorporated into the article to ensure its accuracy and currency.